Showing posts with label Oakland violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oakland violence. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

An Oaklander's Rebuttal to Pine's Needles

Charlie Pine, of Oakland Residents for Peaceful Neighborhoods, recently wrote a retort to the supposed hypocrisy demonstrated by Oakland officials in denying HBO a permit to film their series “Gentlemen of Leisure,” focusing on pimps in Oakland. He claims that despite Mayor Ron Dellums’ refusal to grant the film permit, city government doesn’t actually care about Oakland’s image and well being because they “give grants and jobs to gutter rappers and other assorted practitioners of thug culture.” He goes on to criticize the mayor, city counsel, local hip-hop artists and a prominent youth center in a rant that lacks depth and a comprehensive understanding of Oakland. What follows is a point-by-point response to the smear job and cultural crusade Pine misconstrues as informed advocacy.

Pine first attacks Mayor Dellums’ inclusion of North Oakland rapper Mistah FAB in his inauguration celebration. Pine mentions FAB’s Son of a Pimp album title as supposed evidence of FAB being unfit for participation in a city event. It is a bit cute that OG Pine has done a bit of cursory research on Bay Area hip-hop, but he either didn’t listen to the album or withheld comment because it didn’t help his argument. Mistah FAB’s father was in fact a pimp who died of AIDS when FAB was 12 years of age. The album was titled as a tribute to his deceased father, not as an endorsement of pimping, as Pine’s lack of analysis would lead you to believe.

On the contraire, the album is overwhelmingly positive. FAB speaks on the effects of growing up without a father in songs like “If Papa Was Home” and “Where’s My Daddy.” He thanks his mother for standing by him and raising him right in “The Mama Song,” offers thoughts about mortality in “Call Heaven” and pays tribute to those who have passed away in “U R My Angel.” In still other songs, like “Hoodlife” and “Streets of the Bay,” Mistah FAB gives honest accounts of what’s going on in Oakland’s poorer communities. It may not be all rosy, but that’s life to most in Oakland.
For Charlie Pine, Oakland is very black and white. You’re either in line with his narrow agenda or you’re part of the problem. Pine didn’t grow up in Oakland, so I won’t blame him for not understanding some basic things about the experience. Instead, I will try to give him a hand. If you grow up in the flatlands of Oakland, you experience, participate and/or know folks that have done some dirt in their lives. There is no felon/choirboy dichotomy as Pine would like to believe. FAB certainly has some songs that are less than positive and may depict a less than perfect lifestyle, but he is far from a problematic individual who should be excluded from city events. He should not be indicted, and Mayor Dellums should not be reprimanded for including him in his inaugural festivities.

Pine goes on to attack East Oakland youth center Youth UpRising’s utilization of “pimp rapper” Too $hort’s services. It is definitely true that Too $hort has quite a track record of misogynistic lyrics, but it is also true that he has evolved and is doing his best to reach out and help kids at this point in his life. By his own admission, he has realized that his music has negatively affected people in a way he is not proud of, but I commend him for admitting that and donating his time and services to Youth UpRising (YU).
Too $hort, second from right, with YU students and staff

$hort may have lived a life some disagree with, but we would remiss if we didn’t allow him to grow, evolve and change. There are many who make life changes and try to give back to their communities, $hort’s transformation should be encouraged, not dismissed as ludicrous. For the record he is not a career counselor as Pine claims, simply an individual who donates his time and energy to the center. Watch the video below to hear $hort’s thoughts on the current epidemic of violence. He will not strike you as quite the preying pimp Pine would like you to believe him to be.


I had the privilege of seeing both $hort and FAB at Youth UpRising’s holiday party the other night and it was refreshing to see them giving back to the kids. $hort was in the back helping distribute gifts to the youth (thanks in part to $10,000 from Oakland native and R&B sensation Keyshia Cole). In the meantime FAB spent most of his time in front of the center surrounded by a pack of about 30 kids. The kids rapped for him, talked with him and picked his brain about a variety of topics. Pine can say what he wants about $hort and FAB, but they are doing their best to help the community. Further, YU is smart to harness the rappers’ celebrity to draw more kids into the fold.Mistah FAB, second from right, at YU to promote a benefit event for victims of Hurricane Katrina
A turf dancer flips on the stage of YU's outdoor stage during a dance battle

Pine goes onto diss YU for “hiring out” turf dancers for E-40’s “Tell Me When to Go” music video. Excuse me, but since when has it been a bad thing to give local aspiring dancers a chance to shine on a national stage? Some of those dancers still perform with E-40 on tour to this day. This is not exploitation, as Pine claims, it is a youth center providing youth with career opportunities. Wow, what a travesty! It may be easy for Pine to clump turf dancing, hyphy music, sideshows and violence all under the umbrella of “thug culture,” but the first two are not manifestations of thug culture. Interestingly enough, those are the two mediums that are utilized by YU. Pine’s musical tastes and dancing capabilities may differ a bit from Oakland’s youth, but that doesn’t mean he can indict these forms of self-expression as evil. One would think that a self proclaimed Oakland Resident for Peaceful Neighborhoods would prefer youth using dance and music as outlets rather than violence and drug trafficking.
Pine’s final critique is based on accusations that are completely unrelated to YU’s integrity. Daryell “Green Eyes” Barker, a former YU and Destiny Arts dance instructor, was charged with the molestation an 11 year old girl and possession of a sawed off shot gun. These actions are abominable, but it is unfair to throw him under the bus before he is convicted in a court of law. More importantly however, he was involved with Youth UpRising before the accusations, not after. Are all organizations any criminal has ever worked for to be persecuted when an employee commits a crime? That makes no sense whatsoever. Pine’s strategy at the end of his rant is to throw a bunch of scary sounding words around Youth UpRising’s name to make the organization sound as malicious and backwards as possible. This is simply not the case.

HBO’s proposed series is not necessarily a great idea and I have been disappointed with Dellums’ and the city’s leadership, but Pine’s critique is simply not valid. Are Dellums and the city council perfect? Of course not, but they are not giving “grants and jobs to gutter rappers and other assorted practitioners of thug culture,” as Pine claims. Too $hort and Mistah FAB are not “gutter rappers” and Youth UpRising is not a “practitioner of thug culture.” $hort, FAB and YU may not be perfect, but they are speaking for and to a demographic that Pine is not a part of. His lack of understanding or agreement does not invalidate their voices or tactics. Pine needs to understand, as hard as it may be for him to believe, that Youth UpRising is just as dedicated to eliminating violence as he is, if not more so.
Youth UpRising grew out of youth being disgruntled with violence in Oakland, just as Charlie Pine is. High school youth planned and assembled the project and, with help, secured the funding and real estate for the center. Many of the youth who served on the counsel, myself included, developed the programming and have worked at the center since its completion. None of us would contend that it’s perfect, but all would argue that it’s well intentioned, growing and moderately successful. Pine’s criticisms of Youth UpRising, their allies and strategies are a direct affront to the young people who have worked so hard to help address the epidemic of violence in Oakland.
Charlie Pine says he speaks for Oakland residents for peaceful neighborhoods, as though only his small cadre desire this end. In reality, most of us hate the violence that rages in Oakland’s streets, but some of us have actually built tangible and unprecedented responses to the problem. I commend Charlie Pine for starting an organization that desires peaceful neighborhoods, but smugly sniping at those working toward that vision in the killing fields of East Oakland is disrespectful and unproductive. The traditional tactics have clearly not worked in Oakland’s battle against street violence. Let us allow Youth UpRising to carry out their atypical approaches, and rather than criticizing the city, the county, rappers and residents for supporting them, let us help the cause with our own new ideas. Hopefully we can surround the problem from all angles and eradicate it, rather than shoot each other in the back like the very criminals who terrorize our streets.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Young Oakland's Pride in Violence & Negativity

A few days ago Oakland was named the 5th most dangerous city in the country. It's down from last year's fourth place spot, but still nothing to brag to your grandmother about. I won't dwell too much on the reputability of the study, as there have been numerous critiques, but I will address it from a slightly different perspective.
Oakland has been put on blast again, but the saddest part of such a dishonor is that many view it as quite the opposite- as an honor- including myself sometimes. We have some obsession with our hardness. Find some depressing pride in our pain. Look to the guns and roses as badges of honor. In Oakland we determine our level of neighborhood pride on the number of street shrines, vigils and RIP hoodies, the number of blockheads huggin heat in winter and the number of scrapers smashing down the ave with 12s in trunks and turfs out windows.



There is a reason why folks rep Bushrod and not Rockridge despite their close proximity. Rest assured if the ladder was known as The Rock due to its violence, drug dealing and skyrocketing murder rate, more young folks would cop to living there. The saddest part is that no one should ever feel ashamed to grow up in a good neighborhood. It’s just our Oakland state of mind that twists us. Creates a new rubric. Redefines bad as good and worthy.


To me the ideal would be to determine our level of pride based on our positive control of the block. At present we think we run the street, but standing on a corner and holding no one accountable to any standard of behavior is not control. We find some distorted sense of power in swallowing information, testimonies and killers and then raising our families on the same soiled soils. Do we not value our families? In the words of Thizz Ent’s Vellquan, “If we run the block, how come it ain’t safe for our kids?” Do we really value our veneers of hardness over the well being of our children? Is that the legacy we want Oakland to carry forward into the future?

Outside of Oakland we wear these crime rates and the reputation that precede it as some sort of passport of authenticity. Like can’t no hood in the world touch us, cuz we were born and raised in The Town. That allure is why you meet folks everywhere you go who say they’re from Oakland when they are in fact from Santa Rosa, Pleasanton, Piedmont or Moraga. Yes, they could just be mentioning Oakland thinking that the person they’re talking to won’t know of the suburb they hail from, but San Francisco is a better choice for that endeavor. Lets face it; people want to be from Oakland, but too often it’s for all the wrong reasons. It’s for the authenticity, the struggle, the beauty of the beast, the positives of the negatives that us Oakland natives tend to wax poetic about.Maybe it’s the allure of coming from nothing- even if that shoe doesn’t fit us. So young Oakland too often values rags over riches, the hood-life over the good-life, the gutter over butter. Its not that Oakland isn’t a rough city, it’s that we too often appropriate its hood grandeur to inflate our egos. We could diffuse people’s negative assumptions when they hear we are from Oakland, but all too often we let it ride or fan the flames.


I’m not saying Oakland isn’t worth repping, as anyone who knows me will tell you, I am one of the most Oakland-centric cats you’ll meet, I’m just saying that Oakland has positives to trumpet too.


We could talk about the diverse meccas these avenues are on summer afternoons, the aroma of great food that drifts from East Oakland’s taco trucks, the North’s gourmet ghettos, or Uptown’s culinary rebirth. We could turn folks on to our local art scene, our activism, our revolutionary history, the Raider Nation, the lake, Fairyland our great park system, even scraper bikes. Why do we see the horrors of our national crime rankings as some form of validation? The aforementioned positives have more to do with Oakland being the wonderful place it is, than our high murder rate and rise in violent crime.

Granted, the squalor and the splendor are all part of Oakland, but we need to understand that being the 5th worst city in a national crime study is not an honor. It may not be wholly accurate, but we all know Oakland ain’t exactly Disneyland. I for one will pledge to voice the positive in addition to documenting the negative. I will be honest about the struggle but won’t romanticize it. I will try to make my block reputable by making it safe and sturdy and organize my neighbors to be close and cohesive.

I love Oakland, and soon I hope to love it for all the right reasons. I have attached a recording of a poem I wrote a few years back touching upon some of these issues.

"Your Silence Will Not Protect You"- Coolhand Luke